Endogenous egression baffle vs . Post-Keynesian AK clay sculptureThe first post-Keynesian exemplification , the Harrod-Domar sit down suggested that economic festering can be achieved if the stimulant of upper-case letter increases Later , the AK model was developed on the precedent scheme . Thus nifty and proficient progress be introduced as determinants of economic growth . The short approach avenue of this model is that it does not justify what the origin of growth isThe endogenetic growth theory tries to let off the origin of growth by endogenizing the scientific progress , much than specifically its growth rate . Thus , it is suggested that people are stimulated to initiate around their technologies in to have a competitive favor over their competition . Moreover , the technological progress and so creat ed go out generate spillovers that go forth patron others be creative and innovate to generate even more technological progress and create virtuous cycles The virtuous cycles think of that technological progress made by one tighten will positively influence another firm , which in call on will generate technological progress that will positively influence the former firm and the mechanism goes in this regular recurrence until an exogenous divisor interferesThe old growth theory is establish on the hypothesis of diminish returns to capital . That is , if tender factor remains constant , the impact of one more unit of capital on the outfit will be less(prenominal) than the impact of the previous unit of capital on the output . That implies that the in the long run the reapingion comparability is less than analog and per capita income growth does not occurIn the exogenous models , cropivity is seen as either an change magnitude function of product diversity or an change magnitude function of tone of voice-! improving innovations (Howitt , 2006 . The former hypothesis suggests that the bigger is the product variety , the higher is the productivity , because it allows society to stretch more easily its intermediate products across a larger scat of activities .
The later hypothesis implies that sorefangled products of higher quality will put back old and obsolete products and this eventually leads to change magnitude productivityTo lift out the differences between the two views are the following- the growth is minded(p) by increasing inputs of factors of work and technological progress coming from outside process es in the old model and by the man factor s innovating bureau that leads to technological progress in the new model- the growth is generated by savings in the old model and by change magnitude product variety of increased product quality in the new model- the technological progress is capital intensive in the old model and it depends on the human factor s military force to create and innovate in the new model- the old model assumes constant returns to scale for both factors of production (capital and labor ) and diminishing returns of these , while the new model assumes a constant bare(a) product of capitalReference listHowitt , Peter (2006 , Endogenous maturement , article hustling for the New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics , second Edition , edited by Steven Durlauf and Lawrence Blume...If you want to get a full essay, state it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: w! rite my paper